Showing posts with label quantum mechanics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label quantum mechanics. Show all posts

Thursday, June 17, 2010

Particle Decay is a Random Phenomena: Part I

The standard model tells us that all particles of the same type are indistinguishable. Therefore when describing a system of multiple particles (of the same time) we must take great care to insure our particles are treated as indistinguishable. Accidentally treating particles as identical can cause serious miscalculations. For example (not physics but very illustrative):

For the following questions assume I have two children, child A and child B: the probability of any individual child being a boy is 1/2, the probability of the child being born on a Tuesday is 1/7, etc. For each question I will apply a different set of constraints. Only the constraints mentioned in the question affect that question.

Q1: What is the probability I have two boys?
A1: 1/4.
Q2: Child A is a boy. What is the probability I have two boys?
A2: 1/2.
Q3: At least one of my children is a boy. What is the probability I have two boys?
A3: 1/3.
Q4: At least one of my children is a boy born on Tuesday. What is the probability I have two boys?
A4: 13/27.

The reason for the counterintuitive answers to questions 3 and 4 is that we don't know which child (A or B) satisfies the constraint. Since it could be either the probability of overlap changes the result. The more (less) probable the overlap the closer the answer is to 1/3 (1/2).

But what does this have to do with particle decay?
Quantum Mechanics says there are no hidden variables. If the time a particle had been "alive" affected the probability it would decay in the future then there would have to be some hidden variable to fully describe the particle! If we could look at a particle and tell how long it had been alive then particles would not be indistinguishable!

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Stern-Gerlach


Everyone remembers the Stern-Gerlach experiment; we usually recall it in the context of the discovery of quantized intrinsic spin.  However, I like very much the treatment of Sakurai in his Quantum Mechanics text, which uses Stern-Gerlach as the introduction to shock us into a quantum mechanical way of thinking.

The setup is familiar: Heat up silver atoms which escape through a hole in the oven.  Collimate the beam and send it though an inhomogeneous magnetic field; the force in the z direction on the atom is .  Since the atoms in the oven were randomly oriented, there's no preferred orientation of , so classically we expect to see a vertical splay of particles coming out of the magnetic field.  Of course, we instead see two distinct components, scattered up and down, which leads us to the idea of quantized spin angular momentum.

The fun part begins with sequential Stern-Gerlach setups, adding the ability to rotate the subsequent apparatus on its side to act in the x direction instead of the z. The picture below, stolen from Wikipedia which obviously it stole from Sakurai, shows the results.



The first result makes sense; we removed the minus z portion of the beam, so it doesn't recur.  The second, in which the plus z portion is now split 50-50 into plus and minus x portions, is interesting; maybe 50% of the split beam was z plus and x plus while the other 50% was z plus and x minus?  The third result is the doozy.  We get z minus out at the end, but didn't we remove it in the first splitting?  Apparently the x measurement in the middle destroys our previous information on the z direction of the spin!  We can't know both the spin in z and in x simultaneously; this is obviously not a spinning top.

Sakurai then calms our confusion with an analogy to polarized light, with the x and z spin directions above corresponding to zero and 45 degree polarized light.  In that context, this result would be right at home.  In E&M we write the 45 degree polarization in terms of a linear combination of the 0 degree coordinate vectors, x and y.  For spin, we must turn our thinking to an abstract spin space, where the base vectors Sz+ and Sz- take the place of base vectors x and y in physical space. The Sx spin directions can then be swapped into the idea of the 45 degree polarized light, so should be expressed in terms of our Sz+ and Sz- base vectors:



The missing piece is Sy, the last spin direction, which we correspond to circularly polarized light in this analogy.  Circularly polarized light is expressed as the same combination of base x and y vectors, but with the y portion 45 degrees out of phase.  This now brings imaginary numbers easily into play, as we express a light wave in exponential notation instead of cosines and pull out .  In our corresponding spin vector space we have now been lead to:



So, in a few paragraphs we've seen not only the weirdness of quantum mechanical phenomena, but we've constructed a complex vector space directly out of our observations in Stern-Gerlach and an analogy with our understanding of polarized light.

Source: Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics.