Charged Pion Branching Ratio: Part I

Inherent symmetries in nature lead to conservation laws (perhaps someone will make a post about Noether's Theorem). When we think about the stability of a sub-atomic particle we must think in these terms. Take for example the charged pion, in free space at the tree level. The particle* has mass and charge. (Don't forget to boost into the pion's rest frame) There are no lighter charged hadrons therefore the final state must include a charged lepton of less mass (ie an electron or muon). Our situation looks as follows

Now we invoke conservation of lepton number and conclude that we cannot make the lepton without an associated anti-lepton; charge conservation rules out all particles save neutrinos. So now we have

This situation is the end of the story for the vast majority of pion decays (99,999,999/100,000,000 times in fact). However we can sneak in another particle! The neutral pion is less massive than the charged pion by more than the mass of the electron so we can add a pi-zero to the electron channel (beta decay). We have now arrived at the complete picture.

The next step is to calculate the different decay rates for the various processes and that is a topic for part II!

* I'm playing fast and loose with what is a particle and what is an anti-particle, deal with it.

Charged Pion Decay

Pions are the lightest hadrons and therefore the charged pion can only decay into a neutral pion (beta decay) and/or lighter leptons (electrons and muons). The decay must conserve charge and lepton number; since we need a final state with a charge carrying lepton we must also have the associated neutrino to conserve lepton number. Therefore the weak force is the only mechanism by which the decay may proceed. Thus we arrive at the first order diagram for charged pion decay is as follows (beta decay would manifest itself as a radiating from the blob):

The first vertex is indicated with a blob because the pion is a composite particle and the interaction of the constituent quarks is not fully understood. The outgoing particles are an anti-lepton and its associated neutrino (either a positron or a muon). From the diagram we see that the physics of the decay is independant of which lepton we choose, this independance is known as lepton universality. By examining pion decays and measuring the ratio of electron to muon decays we can test the concept of universality.

Better Know a Particle: The Pion

Yukawa proposed a theory of strong interactions involving a "meson mediator particle" in 1935. The following year the physics community thought they had discovered the particle but in fact they have found the mu meson. Eventually in 1947 experiments conducted in the Pyrenees and the Andes mountain ranges discovered this elusive particle which have come to know as the pion.

The reason for the mountains was simply that high energy particle accelerators were not a common tool for physics yet. The Cosmotron was not powered up until 1953 and the Bevatron wouldn't see beam till the following year. So physicists had to hike up a mountain in the hopes of seeing a pion created by cosmic collisions in the atmosphere.

Jumping forward a few decades we now know plenty about the pion. There are three flavours:. With identical masses for the charged flavours of approximately 140 MeV/c/c and slightly lower mass for the neutral flavour. The charged pions are each other's antiparticles but the discussion of the neutral pion's antiparticle is best left to another post. Pions are bound states of the lightest quarks, and as mesons are a quark-antiquark pair ().

Finally pions are unstable particles. The neutral pion decays electromagnetically into two photons with a mean lifetime around . The decay of the charged pion is very interesting and follows the form where the neutrino has opposite lepton number of the muon. Not only is this decay a weak decay and thus on a much slower timescale (26ns) but naively one would expect to be a more common decay mode due to larger phase space. The topic of why the muon channel dominates is again a topic for another post.

Links to Experiments and Results about pions:

http://pen.phys.virginia.edu/

http://pienu.triumf.ca/

http://prl.aps.org/abstract/PRL/v103/i5/e051802

Particle Decay is a Random Phenomena: Prelude

Before we begin, a small exercise:

The probability for a pion to decay in 26ns is .

Q: We make a pion. What is the probability that it decays during the next 26ns?

A: .

Q: We make a pion. It lives for 26ns. What is the probability that it decays during the next 26ns?

A: .

Q: We find a pion sitting on the sidewalk. What is the probability that it decays during the next 26ns?

A: .

Often people get confused when thinking about particle decay. The reason for the confusion is that particles decay randomly and humans inherently do not understand randomness. Further confounding the problem is the human desire to treat everything else like a human. To this extent we say particles have a lifetime, which implies the particle has an age. But in fact the probability that a particle would have decayed in the previous second is the exact same as the probability that it will decay in the next second. The pion could be 1 million years old and the probability of it decaying in the next 26ns is still . However that is one unlikely pion to still be "alive".

Mathematically speaking: ; is the number of pions, and is the decay rate of pions.